Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 75: 1637-1641, 1993;
8750-7587/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Houtkooper, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Houtkooper, L. B.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 75, Issue 4 1637-1641, Copyright © 1993 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Prediction of body composition in premenopausal females from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

N. J. Hansen, T. G. Lohman, S. B. Going, M. C. Hall, R. W. Pamenter, L. A. Bare, T. W. Boyden and L. B. Houtkooper
Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.

Four methods for predicting body composition were compared in premenopausal females (n = 100), 28-39 yr old, by using underwater weighing (UWW) as the criterion method. The four methods were dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), skinfolds, bioelectrical impedance, and body mass index. The sample had a mean percent fat (%fat) of 29.7 +/- 6.8% (SD) by DEXA and 29.9 +/- 5.8% measured by UWW. DEXA yielded a standard error of estimate (SE) of 2.4% (r = 0.91) for the prediction of %fat from UWW. When %fat was estimated from other methods, larger SEs were obtained: 3.0% for skin-folds, 3.3% for body mass index, and 2.9% for bioelectrical impedance (height2/resistance) plus weight. Individual body density values derived from UWW were corrected for bone mineral variation. DEXA predicted the corrected body density with a lower SE (0.0040 vs. 0.0053 g/ml) than the original density values. We conclude that DEXA was a precise method and correlated highly with fat-free body weight and %fat from UWW in this homogeneous female sample.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. Miyachi, H. Tanaka, H. Kawano, M. Okajima, and I. Tabata
Lack of age-related decreases in basal whole leg blood flow in resistance-trained men
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2005; 99(4): 1384 - 1390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. E. Larson-Meyer, B. R. Newcomer, and G. R. Hunter
Influence of endurance running and recovery diet on intramyocellular lipid content in women: a 1H NMR study
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2002; 282(1): E95 - E106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
U. G. Kyle, L. Genton, G. Mentha, L. Nicod, D. O. Slosman, and C. Pichard
Reliable Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Estimate of Fat-free Mass in Liver, Lung, and Heart Transplant Patients
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, March 1, 2001; 25(2): 45 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
A. M. Shipp, P. R. Gentry, G. Lawrence, C. Van Landingham, T. Covington, H. J. Clewell, K. Gribben, and K. Crump
Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations
Toxicology and Industrial Health, October 1, 2000; 16(9-10): 335 - 438.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. B Houtkooper, S. B Going, J. Sproul, R. M Blew, and T. G Lohman
Comparison of methods for assessing body-composition changes over 1 y in postmenopausal women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2000; 72(2): 401 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. M. Salamone, T. Fuerst, M. Visser, M. Kern, T. Lang, M. Dockrell, J. A. Cauley, M. Nevitt, F. Tylavsky, and T. G. Lohman
Measurement of fat mass using DEXA: a validation study in elderly adults
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2000; 89(1): 345 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
W. C. Fornetti, J. M. Pivarnik, J. M. Foley, and J. J. Fiechtner
Reliability and validity of body composition measures in female athletes
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 1999; 87(3): 1114 - 1122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
W. M. Kohrt
Preliminary evidence that DEXA provides an accurate assessment of body composition
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 1998; 84(1): 372 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. M. Prior, K. J. Cureton, C. M. Modlesky, E. M. Evans, M. A. Sloniger, M. Saunders, and R. D. Lewis
In vivo validation of whole body composition estimates from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 1997; 83(2): 623 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online