Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 75: 1294-1299, 1993;
8750-7587/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kadhiresan, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Faulkner, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kadhiresan, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Faulkner, J. A.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 75, Issue 3 1294-1299, Copyright © 1993 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Tenotomy and repair of latissimus dorsi muscles in rats: implications for transposed muscle grafts

V. A. Kadhiresan, P. J. Guelinckx and J. A. Faulkner
Department of Physiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor 48109-2007.

The functional properties of latissimus dorsi (LTD) muscles were evaluated 160 to 180 days after tenotomy and repair, when grafts had stabilized. Our hypothesis was that, compared with control LTD muscles, LTD grafts would develop less absolute force and power but that the specific force and normalized power would not differ. Expressed as a percentage of the value for control LTD muscles, values for grafts were 67% for muscle mass, 74% for mean single fiber cross-sectional area, 56% for maximum absolute isometric tetanic force, 64% for maximum absolute average force during shortening, and 70% for maximum absolute power. Compared with control LTD muscles, grafts showed no significant differences either in the number of fibers in the total muscle cross section or in the optimum velocity for the development of power. When force and power of grafts were normalized for total fiber cross-sectional area and mass, respectively, only the value for maximum specific force (84% of control value) was significant. The mechanisms responsible for the decrease in specific force after tenotomy and repair are not known. In contrast to the deficit in maximum specific force, the 30% deficit in maximum absolute power of grafts compared with control LTD muscles was explained completely by the 33% smaller muscle mass.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online