Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 75, Issue 3 1053-1061, Copyright © 1993 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Functional electrical stimulation and respiration during sleep

M. J. Decker, J. Haaga, J. L. Arnold, D. Atzberger and K. P. Strohl
Department of Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Ohio.

During obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), respiratory activation of upper airway muscles, particularly genioglossus, is ineffective during sleep. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of muscles reportedly reduces the number and length of OSAs. Our goals were to examine the effect of FES on sensation during wakefulness and on OSA events. Studies were performed in 11 subjects: 4 healthy asymptomatic subjects and 7 patients with OSA. Surface electrodes placed on the submental region produced discomfort; however, during sleep, the stimulus intensity producing arousal was significantly greater than that producing barely tolerable discomfort during wakefulness. Additionally, we developed a protocol for placement of fine-wire electrodes into the neurovascular bundle of the hypoglossal nerve, using recognizable radiographic features and computerized axial tomography as guides. In these patients, while awake, optimal wire placement was associated with visible tongue protrusion without discomfort. With both surface stimulation and fine-wire FES, during sleep the stimulus intensity required to produce obvious electroencephalographic arousal was significantly greater than that producing a barely tolerable sensation while awake. During apneic events, the application of surface stimulation had an inconsistent effect, terminating 22% of the apneas, and fine-wire FES also had a limited impact, terminating 23% of the apneic events. We conclude from our studies that subjects tolerate surface and fine-wire FES to higher stimulus parameters during sleep than during wakefulness but that both approaches have an inconsistent effect on apneas during sleep.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. F. Fregosi Influence of tongue muscle contraction and dynamic airway pressure on velopharyngeal volume in the rat J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2008; 104(3): 682 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Oliven, M. Odeh, L. Geitini, R. Oliven, U. Steinfeld, A. R. Schwartz, and N. Tov Effect of coactivation of tongue protrusor and retractor muscles on pharyngeal lumen and airflow in sleep apnea patients J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2007; 103(5): 1662 - 1668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Oliven, N. Tov, L. Geitini, U. Steinfeld, R. Oliven, A. R. Schwartz, and M. Odeh Effect of genioglossus contraction on pharyngeal lumen and airflow in sleep apnoea patients Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2007; 30(4): 748 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Oliven, D. J. O'Hearn, A. Boudewyns, M. Odeh, W. De Backer, P. van de Heyning, P. L. Smith, D. W. Eisele, L. Allan, H. Schneider, et al. Upper airway response to electrical stimulation of the genioglossus in obstructive sleep apnea J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2003; 95(5): 2023 - 2029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Schwartz, M. L. Bennett, P. L. Smith, W. De Backer, J. Hedner, A. Boudewyns, P. Van de Heyning, H. Ejnell, W. Hochban, L. Knaack, et al. Therapeutic Electrical Stimulation of the Hypoglossal Nerve in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, October 1, 2001; 127(10): 1216 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]