Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 75: 424-431, 1993;
8750-7587/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winn, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cain, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winn, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cain, S. M.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 75, Issue 1 424-431, Copyright © 1993 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effects of NG-substituted arginines on coronary vascular function after endotoxin

M. J. Winn, B. Vallet, N. K. Asante, S. E. Curtis and S. M. Cain
Department of Pharmacology, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35294.

We investigated the responses of canine coronary rings to endothelium-derived relaxing factor-nitric oxide- (EDRF-NO) dependent agonists and NO synthase (NOS) inhibitors 3 h after endotoxic shock was induced in dogs by lipopolysaccharide infusion (LPS; 2 mg/kg). EDRF-NO-dependent relaxation to thrombin [control maximum response produced after administration of thrombin (Emax) was -85.2 +/- 7.0% of the constrictor response produced by the thromboxane analogue U-46619], acetylcholine (control Emax -88.4 +/- 3.4%), or bradykinin (control Emax -80.5 +/- 2.2%) was not inhibited by LPS (Emax thrombin -75.9 +/- 9.5%; Emax acetylcholine -90.2 +/- 2.4%; Emax bradykinin -91.6 +/- 3.4%). The NOS inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) (10(-6)-3 x 10(-4) M) caused constriction of rings with endothelium (Emax 36.3 +/- 5.6%), an effect that was greater after LPS (Emax 59.2 +/- 4.1%; P < 0.05). D-NMMA had no effect in control, but it increased tension after LPS (Emax 20.8 +/- 9.7%). Contrary to expectations, L- and D-NMMA relaxed endothelium-denuded rings (-30.4 +/- 8.7% L-NMMA; -45.1 +/- 11.7% D-NMMA; P < 0.05). However, neither agent caused relaxation after in vivo LPS (10.2 +/- 3.4% L-NMMA; 8.9 +/- 5.2% D-NMMA). N omega-nitro-L-arginine-methylester (L-NAME) and nitro-L-arginine (10(-6)-3 x 10(-4) M) increased tension (Emax 82.3 +/- 23.9 and 73.1 +/- 8.8%, respectively) but only when endothelium was present, and the increases were no greater in LPS-treated groups than in controls (with LPS: Emax L-NAME 87.3 +/- 16.5%; Emax nitro-L-arginine 65.7 +/- 3.3%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online