Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 74: 2860-2867, 1993;
8750-7587/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen-Urstad, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sahlin, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jensen-Urstad, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sahlin, K.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 74, Issue 6 2860-2867, Copyright © 1993 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

High lactate and NH3 release during arm vs. leg exercise is not due to beta-adrenoceptor stimulation

M. Jensen-Urstad, G. Ahlborg and K. Sahlin
Department of Clinical Physiology, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

To investigate the differences in metabolic response between arm exercise (AE) and leg exercise (LE) and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms, seven men were studied during 20 min of AE or LE both with (beta) and without (control, C) nonselective beta-blockade (beta B) (propranolol). The work loads corresponded to 59 and 60% of peak pulmonary O2 uptake (VO2) during LE and AE, respectively. Pulmonary VO2 increased more slowly at the onset of exercise during AEC (half time = 61 +/- 9 s) than during LEC (half time = 35 +/- 3 s) and was not affected by beta B. At the onset of exercise the arteriovenous O2 difference across the exercising limb increased above that of steady state during AEC but not during LEC. This demonstrates that the adjustment of O2 delivery is slower than that of arm VO2 during AE. Despite the smaller exercising muscle mass, the release of lactate and NH3 was about twofold higher during AEC than during LEC. The difference in metabolic response between AE and LE was not altered by beta B. Lactate release was not reduced by beta B but, if anything, tended to increase during both AE and LE (beta vs. C). beta B increased NH3 release during LE (beta vs. C) but not during AE (beta vs. C). We conclude that AE compared with LE at the same relative work load is associated with a greater release of lactate and NH3, indicating a more severe metabolic stress during AE. Furthermore, the present data suggest that the increase in blood lactate at these submaximal exercise intensities is caused by factors other than beta-adrenoceptor stimulation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online