Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 74: 1045-1055, 1993;
8750-7587/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Habib, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Habib, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, A. C.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 74, Issue 3 1045-1055, Copyright © 1993 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Total respiratory input impedance with the upper airway wall shunt minimized

R. H. Habib and A. C. Jackson
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Massachusetts 02215.

Respiratory impedances (Zrs) measured with the cheeks manually supported (Zsc) demonstrate an antiresonance (AR) at approximately 170 Hz, whereas those measured with the head generator (Zhg) have an AR at significantly lower frequencies (150 Hz). The differences in the AR between methods were previously attributed to upper airway wall (UAW) shunting in Zsc, and Zhg was believed to represent shunt-free impedance. To test this hypothesis, we measured four independent estimates of Zrs (4-256 Hz) in five healthy adults. Applying the oscillations at the mouth, we measured Zrs with the cheeks unsupported (Zuc) and when the subject's head and neck were enclosed in a rigid chamber completely filled with water (Zwa). We also measured Zhg with the oscillations applied around the head. Because water is incompressible, Zwa should minimize UAW shunt if not completely eliminate it. There were no significant differences in any of the AR features (e.g., location and bandwidth) of Zuc, Zsc, and Zwa. Conversely, all AR features of Zwa and Zhg were significantly different. To assess wall motion during both forms of oscillations (i.e., applied at the mouth and around the head), we measured two UAW local impedances by use of accelerometers placed on the cheeks (Zch) and submental (Zsm) region. Above 40 Hz, Zch and Zsm estimates were significantly dependent on the forcing method. Furthermore, Zch and Zsm made with the standard oscillations were consistent with the lumped UAW impedances measured with a head plethysmograph, whereas those made with the oscillations around the head were not. Therefore we conclude that, at > 32 Hz, Zsc more closely represents shunt-free impedance than does Zhg and hence should be preferred when Zrs are measured.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
P. M. Lehrer, E. Vaschillo, B. Vaschillo, S.-E. Lu, A. Scardella, M. Siddique, and R. H. Habib
Biofeedback Treatment for Asthma
Chest, August 1, 2004; 126(2): 352 - 361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
U. Frey, B. Suki, R. Kraemer, and A. C. Jackson
Human respiratory input impedance between 32 and 800 Hz, measured by interrupter technique and forced oscillations
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 1997; 82(3): 1018 - 1023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online