Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 73, Issue 6 2709-2712, Copyright © 1992 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Energetics of walking and running: insights from simulated reduced-gravity experiments

C. T. Farley and T. A. McMahon
Museum of Comparative Zoology, Concord Field Station, Massachusetts.

On Earth, a person uses about one-half as much energy to walk a mile as to run a mile. On another planet with lower gravity, would walking still be more economical than running? When people carry weights while they walk or run, energetic cost increases in proportion to the added load. It would seem to follow that if gravity were reduced, energetic cost would decrease in proportion to body weight in both gaits. However, we find that under simulated reduced gravity, the rate of energy consumption decreases in proportion to body weight during running but not during walking. When gravity is reduced by 75%, the rate of energy consumption is reduced by 72% during running but only by 33% during walking. Because reducing gravity decreases the energetic cost much more for running than for walking, walking is not the cheapest way to travel a mile at low levels of gravity. These results suggest that the link between the mechanics of locomotion and energetic cost is fundamentally different for walking and for running.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. P. J. Teunissen, A. Grabowski, and R. Kram Effects of independently altering body weight and body mass on the metabolic cost of running J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2007; 210(24): 4418 - 4427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Rubenson, D. B. Heliams, S. K. Maloney, P. C. Withers, D. G. Lloyd, and P. A. Fournier Reappraisal of the comparative cost of human locomotion using gait-specific allometric analyses J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2007; 210(20): 3513 - 3524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Courtine, S. J. Harkema, C. J. Dy, Y. P. Gerasimenko, and P. Dyhre-Poulsen Modulation of multisegmental monosynaptic responses in a variety of leg muscles during walking and running in humans J. Physiol., August 1, 2007; 582(3): 1125 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Griffin Powering locomotion? It's a loaded question J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1273 - 1274. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ishikawa, P. V. Komi, M. J. Grey, V. Lepola, and G.-P. Bruggemann Muscle-tendon interaction and elastic energy usage in human walking J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2005; 99(2): 603 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Modica and R. Kram Metabolic energy and muscular activity required for leg swing in running J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 2126 - 2131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Pontzer A new model predicting locomotor cost from limb length via force production J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2005; 208(8): 1513 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Grabowski, C. T. Farley, and R. Kram Independent metabolic costs of supporting body weight and accelerating body mass during walking J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2005; 98(2): 579 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Biewener, C. T. Farley, T. J. Roberts, and M. Temaner Muscle mechanical advantage of human walking and running: implications for energy cost J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2004; 97(6): 2266 - 2274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. P. Ivanenko, R. Grasso, V. Macellari, and F. Lacquaniti Control of Foot Trajectory in Human Locomotion: Role of Ground Contact Forces in Simulated Reduced Gravity J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 3070 - 3089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Walker Functional Morphology and Virtual Models: Physical Constraints on the Design of Oscillating Wings, Fins, Legs, and Feet at Intermediate Reynolds Numbers Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2002; 42(2): 232 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P Ferris, P. Aagaard, E. B Simonsen, C. T Farley, and P. Dyhre-Poulsen Soleus H-reflex gain in humans walking and running under simulated reduced gravity J. Physiol., January 1, 2001; 530(1): 167 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G A Cavagna, P A Willems, and N C Heglund The role of gravity in human walking: pendular energy exchange, external work and optimal speed J. Physiol., November 1, 2000; 528(3): 657 - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Donelan and R Kram Exploring dynamic similarity in human running using simulated reduced gravity J. Exp. Biol., January 8, 2000; 203(16): 2405 - 2415. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Chang, H. Huang, C. Hamerski, and R Kram The independent effects of gravity and inertia on running mechanics J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2000; 203(2): 229 - 238. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y.-H. Chang and R. Kram Metabolic cost of generating horizontal forces during human running J Appl Physiol, May 1, 1999; 86(5): 1657 - 1662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Griffin, N. A. Tolani, and R. Kram Walking in simulated reduced gravity: mechanical energy fluctuations and exchange J Appl Physiol, January 1, 1999; 86(1): 383 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Bellizzi, K. A. D. King, S. K. Cushman, and P. G. Weyand Does the application of ground force set the energetic cost of cross-country skiing? J Appl Physiol, November 1, 1998; 85(5): 1736 - 1743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]