Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 73: 825-831, 1992;
8750-7587/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manning, H.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manning, H.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 73, Issue 3 825-831, Copyright © 1992 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Oxygen cost of resistive-loaded breathing in quadriplegia

H. Manning, F. D. McCool, S. M. Scharf, E. Garshick and R. Brown
Department of Medicine, Brockton-West Roxbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Massachusetts 02132.

We hypothesized that, in quadriplegia, chest wall distortion would increase the energy cost of ventilation. To assess this, we measured the oxygen cost of breathing (VO2 resp) and changes in chest wall configuration during inspiratory resistive-loaded breathing tasks in five quadriplegic and five normal subjects. Each subject performed three breathing tasks that spanned a range of work rates (Wtot). Configurational changes of the abdomen and upper, lower, and transverse rib cage were assessed with magnetometers. We found that 1) in both groups, VO2resp increased linearly with Wtot over the range of tasks performed, 2) the mean slope of the regression line of VO2resp vs. Wtot was greater for quadriplegic than for normal subjects (3.7 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.7 ml O2/J, P less than 0.01), 3) efficiency of breathing (Wtot/VO2resp) was less for quadriplegic than for normal subjects (1.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 3.5 +/- 1.4%, P less than 0.001), 4) during inhalation, upper and lower rib cages behaved similarly in the two groups, but the quadriplegic subjects had a decrease in transverse rib cage and a much greater increase in abdomen than normal subjects, and 5) functional residual capacity decreased in normal but not in quadriplegic subjects during the breathing tasks. We conclude that the lesser efficiency of breathing in quadriplegia may be related to the elastic work of chest wall distortion, shorter mean operational diaphragm length, and possibly differences between normal and quadriplegic subjects in mechanical advantage of available inspiratory muscles.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online