Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 73: 1047-1051, 1992;
8750-7587/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delhaas, T.
Right arrow Articles by Zijlstra, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Delhaas, T.
Right arrow Articles by Zijlstra, W. G.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 73, Issue 3 1047-1051, Copyright © 1992 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Respiration and measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution and central or peripheral dye dilution

T. Delhaas, G. A. Mook and W. G. Zijlstra
Department of Medical Physiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

Cardiac output as measured by indicator dilution methods during artificial ventilation shows differences up to +/- 35%. We studied the influence of spontaneous breathing on measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution (TD) and central (CDD) and peripheral dye dilution (PDD) in seven anesthetized dogs. Injection of indicator was timed at one of five chosen moments in a respiratory cycle. The indicator for TD was also used as solvent for indocyanine green. Results were normalized by the value obtained with injection at inspiratory onset. Results of the central dilution methods showed a slight but not significant difference between values measured with injection at 25 and 75% of the respiratory cycle: 105.7 and 98.0%, respectively, (TD) and 102.3 and 97.2% (CDD). Mean cardiac output determined by TD, CDD, or PDD was not significantly different. We conclude that 1) a reasonable estimate of cardiac output may be obtained by means of a single indicator-dilution curve and 2) the choice of the dilution method may be determined by practical considerations.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online