Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 72: 410-415, 1992;
8750-7587/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cote, A.
Right arrow Articles by Meehan, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cote, A.
Right arrow Articles by Meehan, B.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 72, Issue 2 410-415, Copyright © 1992 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Metabolic and cardiorespiratory effects of doxapram and theophylline in sleeping newborn piglets

A. Cote, P. W. Blanchard and B. Meehan
Jeremy Rill Clinical and Research Centre for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and Apnea, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal Children's Hospital-Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

To evaluate the contribution of a change in metabolic rate to ventilatory changes after the administration of respiratory stimulants, we studied the effect of two respiratory stimulants, doxapram and theophylline, on ventilation and metabolic rate during sleep in piglets. Metabolic rate (O2 consumption and CO2 production) was measured in a metabolic chamber, and alveolar ventilation (VA) was derived from arterial PCO2 and CO2 production. We studied the animals during a baseline period and for 2 h after the administration of theophylline or doxapram. With doxapram, there was no change in VA, metabolic rate, or arterial PCO2. In contrast, with theophylline, VA increased [20 +/- 14% (SD), P less than 0.003] as a result of both an increased metabolic rate and hyperventilation. Doxapram, however, increased mean blood pressure (from 67 +/- 11 to 75 +/- 13 mmHg, P less than 0.005), whereas theophylline did not result in blood pressure changes. In summary, during quiet sleep, doxapram, unlike theophylline, does not stimulate either respiration or metabolic rate. We speculate that the previous reports of increased ventilation after the administration of doxapram are due to the general stimulation of activity in the awake state, an effect not seen during sleep.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online