Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 72, Issue 1 15-22, Copyright © 1992 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Is there energy conservation in amenorrheic compared with eumenorrheic distance runners?

J. H. Wilmore, K. C. Wambsgans, M. Brenner, C. E. Broeder, I. Paijmans, J. A. Volpe and K. M. Wilmore
Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas, Austin 78712.

The female distance runner is considered at high risk for secondary amenorrhea and reduced spinal bone mineral, and recent studies have suggested that these disturbances might be nutritionally or metabolically linked. The present study investigated 1) whether there is a physiological basis by which the amenorrheic runner might maintain weight at a lower than expected caloric intake, i.e., conservation of energy, and 2) the potential interactions of reduced energy intake, secondary amenorrhea, and reductions in bone density. Subjects included 13 elite female distance runners, 8 amenorrheic and 5 eumenorrheic, and 5 untrained female controls. Body composition by hydrostatic weighing, bone density and mineral content by dual-photon absorptiometry, and blood samples for hormonal analyses (once per week for 4 wk) were obtained, as were duplicate measures for resting metabolic rate, thermic effect of a meal, and the energy cost of specific (treadmill) and nonspecific (cycle ergometer) physical activity. Energy intake and energy expenditure were estimated by 3-day logs. Energy intakes did not differ (1,781, 1,690, and 1,763 kcal), nor did energy expenditures (2,480, 2,314, and 2,268 kcal), for the amenorrheic and eumenorrheic runner and control groups, respectively. The difference between reported energy intake and estimated energy expenditure of 500-700 kcal was likely due to underreporting or restricting intake, inasmuch as there was no evidence of energy conservation. A possible link was suggested between disordered eating, secondary amenorrhea, and bone mineral loss.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A B Loucks Refutation of "the myth of the female athlete triad" Br. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2007; 41(1): 55 - 57. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. E. Foster-Schubert, A. McTiernan, R. S. Frayo, R. S. Schwartz, K. B. Rajan, Y. Yasui, S. S. Tworoger, and D. E. Cummings Human Plasma Ghrelin Levels Increase during a One-Year Exercise Program J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 820 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. I. Williams, D. L. Helmreich, D. B. Parfitt, A. Caston-Balderrama, and J. L. Cameron Evidence for a Causal Role of Low Energy Availability in the Induction of Menstrual Cycle Disturbances during Strenuous Exercise Training J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2001; 86(11): 5184 - 5193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. W.R. Lemon Beyond the Zone: Protein Needs of Active Individuals J. Am. Coll. Nutr., October 1, 2000; 19(90005): 513S - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Smith, J. Dollman, R. T. Withers, M. Brinkman, J. P. Keeves, and D. G. Clark Relationship between maximum aerobic power and resting metabolic rate in young adult women J Appl Physiol, January 1, 1997; 82(1): 156 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]