Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 71: 2146-2151, 1991;
8750-7587/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takubo, T.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takubo, T.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, J. G.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 71, Issue 6 2146-2151, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Epithelium modulates the potency of vasoactive intestinal peptide in the guinea pig

T. Takubo, K. Banks and J. G. Martin
Meakins-Christie Laboratories, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the importance of the epithelium in determining the potency of exogenous vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in inhibiting responses of isolated guinea pig trachea to vagal stimulation. Isolated innervated tracheal preparations (n = 56) were mounted in glass organ baths in Krebs-Henseleit (K-H) solution at 37 degrees C and gassed with 95% O2-5% CO2. The inside of the trachea was separately perfused with K-H solution at 1 ml/min. The vagal nerve trunks were stimulated (20 V, 1-ms pulses, 10-s trains) at low (0.5 Hz) and high frequency (15 Hz) alternately, and the contractile responses were measured as increases in intratracheal pressures. VIP (10(-8)-10(-7) M) inhibited responses to both high- and low-frequency stimulation. VIP was more potent in inhibiting contractions when administered to the outside than the inside surface of the trachea, and disruptionon of the epithelium abolished this difference. The endopeptidase inhibitors phosphoramidon and thiorphan (5 x 10(-6) M) potentiated the action of VIP. These data indicate that the epithelium reduces the efficacy of VIP. We suggest that the epithelium is a site of degradation of VIP by endopeptidase and may also be a diffusion barrier.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online