Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 71: 1296-1301, 1991;
8750-7587/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicolaysen, G.
Right arrow Articles by Staub, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicolaysen, G.
Right arrow Articles by Staub, N. C.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 71, Issue 4 1296-1301, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of catheter size on pressures recorded in small pulmonary veins in dog lung

G. Nicolaysen, J. Shepard, T. Tanita, M. Onizuka, C. Hall and N. C. Staub
Department of Physiology, University of Oslo, Norway.

Controversy continues about the contribution of the veins to pulmonary vascular resistance. From data obtained in studies using intravascular catheters, it appears that a major fraction (up to 44%) of the total pulmonary vascular pressure drop resides in larger (greater than 1.0 mm diam) veins, whereas micropuncture data and various models give much less pressure drop. Theoretically, artifactual pressure drops can be obtained if an intravascular catheter partly obstructs the vessel. We made measurements of pressure in the same lung vein with two different-sized catheters (1.2 and 0.6 mm OD, respectively). In paired experiments the larger catheter always measured a higher pressure than the smaller one, except close to the large lobar vein outlet. In some of the experiments we measured the diameter of the vessel containing the indwelling catheter by freezing the lung and then serial-sectioned the frozen lung. From these data we could infer that the range of vein diameter in the which the smaller catheter measured a lower pressure was 1.5-4 mm. We conclude that the larger catheter overestimated the pressure because of greater obstruction. The pressures obtained with the smaller catheter suggest that little (less than 10%) of the total pulmonary vascular resistance resides in veins larger than approximately 1 mm diam under zone 3 baseline conditions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. H. Chammas, David. A. Rickaby, M. Guarin, J. H. Linehan, C. C. Hanger, and C. A. Dawson
Flow-induced vasodilation in the ferret lung
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 1997; 83(2): 495 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online