Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 71: 99-103, 1991;
8750-7587/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drake, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gabel, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drake, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gabel, J. C.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 71, Issue 1 99-103, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Active lymphatic pumping and sheep lung lymph flow

R. E. Drake, D. Weiss and J. C. Gabel
Center for Microvascular and Lymphatic Studies, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77030.

Active (intrinsic) lymphatic pumping may be an important factor determining lymph flow from the lungs. Unfortunately, in most experiments, it is very difficult to determine the influence of active pumping vs. passive factors on lymph flow. However, 1) the pumping activity (stroke volume and frequency) of isolated lymphatic segments varies nonlinearly with transmural pressure, and 2) the lung lymph flow from awake sheep varies nonlinearly with lymphatic outflow pressure. Accordingly, if lymphatic pumping significantly influences lung lymph flow, then it should be possible to describe the sheep lung lymph flow vs. outflow pressure data with the pumping activity data. To test this, we used published lymphatic pumping activity data to develop a mathematical model of the lymphatic pump for a segment of lymphatic vessel. Flow vs. outflow pressure relationships obtained from simulations with this model were very similar to the data from sheep. Our results indicate that both passive factors and active lymphatic pumping contribute to lymph flow, and our model may allow investigators to distinguish the effects of active pumping vs. passive factors in the regulation of lymph flow.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online