Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 71: 94-98, 1991;
8750-7587/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drake, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gabel, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drake, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gabel, J. C.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 71, Issue 1 94-98, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Estimation of the pulmonary microvascular reflection coefficient to protein in dogs

R. E. Drake and J. C. Gabel
Center for Microvascular and Lymphatic Studies, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77030.

We used a new technique to estimate the pulmonary microvascular membrane reflection coefficient to plasma protein (sigma d) in anesthetized dogs. In five animals we continuously weighed the lower left lung lobe and used a left atrial balloon to increase the pulmonary microvascular pressure (Pc). We determined the relationship between the rate of edema formation (S) and Pc and estimated the fluid filtration coefficient (Kf) as delta S/delta Pc. From the S vs. Pc relationship and Kf, we estimated the Pc at which S/Kf = 10 mmHg for each dog. This pressure (P10) was 38.0 +/- 5.8 (SD) mmHg, and the plasma protein osmotic pressure (pi c) was 14.9 +/- 3.7 mmHg. In five additional dogs in which we decreased pi c to 2.9 +/- 1.7 mmHg, P10 = 27.2 +/- 2.6 mmHg. The P10 vs. pi c regression line fit to the data from all 10 dogs was P10 = 0.92 pi c +/- 24.4 mmHg (r = 0.88). We estimated sigma d from the slope of the regression line as sigma d = square root of delta P10/delta pi c. With this technique, we estimated that, with 95% probability, sigma d lies between 0.72 and unity. This is higher than most previous sigma d estimates.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. W. Klaesner, N. A. Pou, R. E. Parker, C. Finney, and R. J. Roselli
Optical measurement of isolated canine lung filtration coefficients at normal hematocrits
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1997; 83(6): 1976 - 1985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online