Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 71: 9-15, 1991;
8750-7587/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tawfik, B.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tawfik, B.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, H. K.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 71, Issue 1 9-15, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

A new method to measure nasal impedance in spontaneously breathing adults

B. Tawfik, K. J. Sullivan and H. K. Chang
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089-1451.

As an alternative to standard rhinomanometric methods, we applied forced oscillations at the mouth in five normal subjects and determined their nasal impedance with a novel method involving flow subtraction. Pressure oscillations of constant amplitude were applied at the mouth of a subject both when the nostrils were open and when they were closed with a noseclip. The airflows measured under the two conditions were subtracted to yield the oscillating nasal airflow at the imposed pressure. The resultant pressure-flow relation defined the nasal impedance of the subject. For frequencies between 3 and 15 Hz, the transnasal pressure-flow relation was well described by a linear lumped parameter model consisting of a resistive and inertial element. Nasal resistance obtained with flow subtraction did not differ significantly from control measurements obtained while the subjects performed the Valsalva maneuver. In contrast, nasal inertance obtained with flow subtraction was approximately twice that obtained with the Valsalva method. The difference between inertances may reflect structural changes in nasopharyngeal dimensions that occur with the Valsalva maneuver. We conclude that the mechanical impedance of the nasal passage may be determined during spontaneous breathing from the response to imposed forced oscillations at the mouth. The noninvasive nature of this method suggests that it may be simpler to implement than traditional rhinomanometric methods.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ThoraxHome page
G L Hall, Z Hantos, J H Wildhaber, and P D Sly
Contribution of nasal pathways to low frequency respiratory impedance in infants
Thorax, May 1, 2002; 57(5): 396 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
K. R. Sharma, J. A. Kent- Braun, S. Majumdar, Y. Huang, M. Mynhier, M. W. Weiner, and R. G. Miller
Physiology of fatigue in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Neurology, April 1, 1995; 45(4): 733 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online