Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 70, Issue 5 2080-2086, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Upper airway cooling and l-menthol reduce ventilation in the guinea pig

G. P. Orani, J. W. Anderson, G. Sant'Ambrogio and F. B. Sant'Ambrogio
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77550.

Cooling of the upper airway, which stimulates specific cold receptors and inhibits laryngeal mechanoreceptors, reduces respiratory activity in unanesthetized humans and anesthetized animals. This study shows that laryngeal cooling affects the pattern of breathing in the guinea pig and assesses the potential role of cold receptors in this response by using a specific stimulant of cold receptors (l-menthol). The response to airflows (30 ml/s, 10-s duration) through the isolated upper airway was studied in 23 anesthetized (urethan, 1 g/kg ip) guinea pigs breathing through a tracheostomy. Respiratory airflow, tidal volume, laryngeal temperature, and esophageal pressure were recorded before the challenges (control), during cold airflows (25 degrees C, 55% relative humidity), and during warm airflows (37 degrees C, saturated) with or without the addition of l-menthol. Whereas warm air trials had no effect, cold air trials, which lowered laryngeal but not nasal temperature, reduced ventilation (VE) to 85% of control, mainly by prolonging expiratory time (TE, 145% of control), an effect abolished by laryngeal anesthesia. Addition of l-menthol to the warm airflow caused a greater reduction in VE (41% of control) by prolonging TE (1,028% of control). Nasal anesthesia markedly reduced the apneogenic effect of l-menthol but did not affect the response to cold air trials. In conclusion, both cooling of the larynx and l-menthol in the laryngeal lumen reduce ventilation. Exposure of the nasal cavity to l-menthol markedly enhances this ventilatory inhibition; considering the stimulatory effect of l-menthol on cold receptors, these results suggest a predominant role of nasal cold receptors in this response.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Hallani, J. R. Wheatley, and T. C. Amis Initiating oral breathing in response to nasal loading: asthmatics versus healthy subjects Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2008; 31(4): 800 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Redolfi, M. Raux, C. Donzel-Raynaud, C. Morelot-Panzini, M. Zelter, J-P. Derenne, T. Similowski, and C. Straus Effects of upper airway anaesthesia on respiratory-related evoked potentials in humans Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2005; 26(6): 1097 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. L. Benowitz, B. Herrera, and P. Jacob III Mentholated Cigarette Smoking Inhibits Nicotine Metabolism J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2004; 310(3): 1208 - 1215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Stella and S. J. England Modulation of laryngeal and respiratory pump muscle activities with upper airway pressure and flow J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2001; 91(2): 897 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. NISHINO, Y. TAGAITO, and Y. SAKURAI Nasal Inhalation of l-menthol Reduces Respiratory Discomfort Associated with Loaded Breathing Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 1997; 156(1): 309 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text]