Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 68: 843-848, 1990;
8750-7587/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dall'ava-Santucci, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lockhart, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dall'ava-Santucci, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lockhart, A.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 68, Issue 3 843-848, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Mechanical effects of PEEP in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome

J. Dall'ava-Santucci, A. Armaganidis, F. Brunet, J. F. Dhainaut, S. Nouira, D. Morisseau and A. Lockhart
Department of Physiology, Cochin-Port Royal University Hospital, Paris, France.

In 10 patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome, we studied the effects on respiratory system mechanics of two levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), best PEEP (BP) and half of this value (HBP), using a respiratory inductive plethysmograph (RIP) combined with a super syringe. We found the following. 1) Inflation compliance of pressure-volume (PV) curves did not change significantly. 2) End-expiratory volume increased with HBP and further with BP (278 +/- 186 and 464 +/- 313 ml, respectively, P less than 0.01). This increase was positively correlated with inflation compliance for HBP and BP (r = 0.794, P less than 0.01 and r = 0.876, P less than 0.01, respectively). 3) No dynamic hyper-inflation was detected on mechanical ventilation at zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP), and the time constant of the respiratory system was in the normal range (0.79 +/- 0.21 s). 4) Hysteresis of PVrip curves, which were corrected for gas exchange, decreased significantly with PEEP (P less than 0.05). We conclude that PEEP does not change inflation PV curve but induces an increase in intrathoracic volume whose magnitude is related to compliance and PEEP level. The reduction of hysteresis with PEEP suggests less gas trapping and thus a functional improvement.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online