Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 68: 787-791, 1990;
8750-7587/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Badgwell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heavner, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Badgwell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heavner, J. E.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 68, Issue 2 787-791, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Alveolar dead space does not affect indirect Fick cardiac output determinations

J. M. Badgwell and J. E. Heavner
Department of Anesthesiology, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Lubbock 79430.

We examined the influence of three variables (different breathing circuits, breath selected for analysis, and alveolar dead space ventilation) on the accuracy of noninvasive cardiac output determinations with the Fick CO2 (indirect) equation. We compared noninvasive determinations with invasive thermodilution measurements over a wide range of cardiac outputs in 17 2-mo-old pigs anesthetized with halothane and nitrous oxide and paralyzed with either pancuronium or d-tubocurare. We found that rebreathing and nonrebreathing circuits provide accurate cardiac output determinations and that the optimal breath for analysis with either the rebreathing or nonrebreathing technique appears to depend on the cardiac output. When alveolar dead space was increased by using positional changes and the intracardiac administration of glass beads, there was still a good correlation between noninvasive and invasive cardiac output determinations. We conclude that both rebreathing and nonrebreathing techniques of indirect Fick cardiac output determinations correlate well with thermodilution measures over a wide range of cardiac outputs and alveolar dead space/tidal volume fractions.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online