Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 68: 35-43, 1990;
8750-7587/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Decramer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Decramer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, M. B.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 68, Issue 1 35-43, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Respiratory changes in diaphragmatic intramuscular pressure

M. Decramer, T. X. Jiang and M. B. Reid
Respiratory Division, Academic Hospital, Pellenberg, Belgium.

We attempted to measure diaphragmatic tension by measuring changes in diaphragmatic intramuscular pressure (Pim) in the costal and crural parts of the diaphragm in 10 supine anesthetized dogs with Gaeltec 12 CT minitransducers. During phrenic nerve stimulation or direct stimulation of the costal and crural parts of the diaphragm in an animal with the chest and abdomen open, Pim invariably increased and a linear relationship between Pim and the force exerted on the central tendon was found (r greater than or equal to 0.93). During quiet inspiration Pim in general decreased in the costal part (-3.9 +/- 3.3 cmH2O), whereas it either increased or slightly decreased in the crural part (+3.3 +/- 9.4 cmH2O, P less than 0.05). Similar differences were obtained during loaded and occluded inspiration. After bilateral phrenicotomy Pim invariably decreased during inspiration in both parts (costal -4.3 +/- 6.4 cmH2O, crural -3.1 +/- 0.6 cmH2O). Contrary to the expected changes in tension in the muscle, but in conformity with the pressure applied to the muscle, Pim invariably increased during passive inflation from functional residual capacity to total lung capacity (costal +30 +/- 23 cmH2O, crural +18 +/- 18 cmH2O). Similarly, during passive deflation from functional residual capacity to residual volume, Pim invariably decreased (costal -12 +/- 19 cmH2O, crural -12 +/- 14 cmH2O). In two experiments similar observations were made with saline-filled catheters. We conclude that although Pim increases during contraction as in other muscles, Pim during respiratory maneuvers is primarily determined by the pleural and abdominal pressures applied to the muscle rather than by the tension developed by it.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online