Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 68: 295-301, 1990;
8750-7587/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P. J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 68, Issue 1 295-301, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Ventilatory effects of substance P, vasoactive intestinal peptide, and nitroprusside in humans

D. L. Maxwell, R. W. Fuller, C. M. Dixon, F. M. Cuss and P. J. Barnes
Department of Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Animal studies suggest that the neuropeptides, substance P and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), may influence carotid body chemoreceptor activity and that substance P may take part in the carotid body response to hypoxia. The effects of these peptides on resting ventilation and on ventilatory responses to hypoxia and to hypercapnia have been investigated in six normal humans. Infusions of substance P (1 pmol.kg-1.min-1) and of VIP (6 pmol.kg-1.min-1) were compared with placebo and with nitroprusside (5 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) as a control for the hypotensive action of the peptides. Both peptides caused significantly less hypotension than nitroprusside. Substance P and nitroprusside caused significantly greater increases in ventilation and in the hypoxic ventilatory response than VIP. No changes were seen in hypercapnic sensitivity. The stimulation of ventilation and the differential effects on ventilatory chemosensitivity that accompanied hypotension are consistent either with stimulation of carotid body chemoreceptor activity or with an interaction with peripheral chemoreceptor input to the respiratory center, as is seen in animals. The similar cardiovascular but different ventilatory effects of the peptides suggest that substance P may also stimulate the carotid body in a manner independent of the effect of hypotension. This is consistent with a role of substance P in the hypoxic ventilatory response in humans.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
T. Saaresranta and O. Polo
Hormones and Breathing
Chest, December 1, 2002; 122(6): 2165 - 2182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online