Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 68: 181-186, 1990;
8750-7587/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giesbrecht, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Younes, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giesbrecht, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Younes, M.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 68, Issue 1 181-186, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Ventilatory effects of high and pulsatile blood flow in the pulmonary circulation

G. G. Giesbrecht and M. Younes
Respiratory Investigation Unit, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

The mechanism of ventilatory stimulation that accompanies increases in cardiac output is unknown. Previous studies addressing this issue have been inconclusive. However, only steady pulmonary blood flow was used. The effect of flow pulsatility merits consideration, because increasing cardiac output raises not only mean pulmonary arterial pressure but also pulse pressure; mechanoreceptors with an important dynamic component to their responses may cause a response to pulsatile, but not steady, flow. Studies were done on anesthetized cats (n = 4) and dogs (n = 4). The right pulmonary artery was cannulated within the pericardium, and systemic blood was pumped from the left atrium to the right pulmonary artery. The right pulmonary circulation was perfused at different levels of flow, which was either steady or pulsatile. Steady-state flow of up to 150 ml.kg-1.min-1 (270 ml.kg-1.min-1 when corrected for the proportion of lung tissue perfused) did not affect breathing pattern. When high pulmonary flow was made pulsatile (pulse pressure approximately 23 mmHg), breath duration decreased from 3.7 +/- 0.72 to 3.4 +/- 0.81 (SD) s (P less than 0.01), representing a change in frequency of only 9%. There was no change in peak inspiratory activity. It was concluded that pulmonary vascular mechanoreceptors are not likely to contribute significantly to the increase in ventilation in association with increases in cardiac output.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online