Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 67: 1489-1494, 1989;
8750-7587/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sznajder, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sznajder, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, L. D.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 67, Issue 4 1489-1494, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Alveolar pressure inhomogeneity and gas exchange during constant-flow ventilation in dogs

J. I. Sznajder, A. Nahum, G. Crawford, E. R. Pollak, P. T. Schumacker and L. D. Wood
Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Analysis of momentum transfer between inflow jets and resident gas during constant-flow ventilation (CFV) predicts inhomogeneity of alveolar pressures (PA) and volume, which might account for specific ventilation-variance in the lung. Using alveolar needles to measure pressures (PA) during CFV in eight anesthetized dogs with wide thoracotomy, we observed random dispersion of PA among lobes of up to 12.5 cmH2O. Within each lobe, the PA dispersion was up to 10 cmH2O at CFV of 90 l/min; when flow decreased, PA at all sites decreased, as did the intralobar dispersion. These pressure differences were not observed during conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). During CFV with room air, dogs were hypoxemic [arterial PO2 (Pao2) 54 +/- 15 Torr] and the venous admixture (Qva/QT) was 50 +/- 15%. When inspiratory O2 fraction was increased to 0.4, Pao2 increased to 172 +/- 35 Torr and Qva/QT dropped to 13.5 +/- 8.4%, confirming considerable ventilation-perfusion (VA/Q) variance not observed during CMV. We conclude that momentum transfer between the inflow stream and resident gas caused inhomogeneities of alveolar pressures, volumes, and ventilation responsible for VA/Q variance and hypoxemia during CFV. Conceivably, the abnormal ventilation distribution is minimized by collateral ventilation and forces of interdependence between regions of high and low alveolar pressures. Momentum transfer also predicted the mucosal damage observed on histological evaluation of the bronchial walls near the site of inflow jet impact.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online