Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 67: 993-1000, 1989;
8750-7587/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khoo, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Yamashiro, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khoo, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Yamashiro, P.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 67, Issue 3 993-1000, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Minimization of lung pressure swings during high-frequency ventilation: a model

M. C. Khoo, S. M. Yamashiro and P. Yamashiro
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089.

The goal of this theoretical study was to develop a simple computational model for determining the lung pressure excursions that accompany the maintenance of adequate gas transport through high-frequency airway oscillations applied via the trachea (HFAO) and by transthoracic means (HFTO). Respiratory mechanics and gas transport parameters estimated from the preceding companion study (J. Appl. Physiol. 67: 985-992, 1989) were used in the model for computing tracheal, alveolar, pleural, and transpulmonary pressure swings. Comparison of model predictions with corresponding data obtained in dogs showed close agreement. The specification of eucapnia as a constraint led to results that were significantly different from previous findings which had assumed constant airflow. We used the model to identify "quasi-optimal" strategies for HFAO and HFTO application in which all pressure excursions were kept below the corresponding levels produced by conventional mechanical ventilation operating at 15 breaths/min. The model suggests the application of both HFAO and HFTO at frequencies substantially lower than the settings commonly employed in high-frequency ventilation. Application of HFAO at frequencies ranging from 1 to 4 Hz is recommended, whereas for HFTO the quasi-optimal range lies between 1 and 1.7 Hz. In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pressure costs during HFAO or HFTO are minimized in the vicinity of 1 Hz.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online