Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 67: 973-979, 1989;
8750-7587/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Series, F.
Right arrow Articles by La Forge, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Series, F.
Right arrow Articles by La Forge, J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 67, Issue 3 973-979, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effects of respiratory drive on upper airways in sleep apnea patients and normal subjects

F. Series, Y. Cormier, M. Desmeules and J. La Forge
Centre de Pneumologie, Hopital Laval, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada.

We compared the changes in nasal and pharyngeal resistance induced by modifications in the central respiratory drive in 8 patients with sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) with the results of 10 normal men. Upper airway pressures were measured with two low-bias flow catheters; one was placed at the tip of the epiglottis and the other above the uvula. Nasal and pharyngeal resistances were calculated at isoflow. During CO2 rebreathing and during the 2 min after maximal voluntary hyperventilation, we continuously recorded upper airway pressures, airflow, end-tidal CO2, and the mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI); inspiratory pressure generated at 0.1 s after the onset of inspiration (P0.1) was measured every 15-20 s. In both groups upper airway resistance decreased as P0.1 increased during CO2 rebreathing. When P0.1 increased by 500%, pharyngeal resistance decreased to 17.8 +/- 3.1% of base-line values in SAS patients and to 34.9 +/- 3.4% in normal subjects (mean +/- SE). During the posthyperventilation period the VT/TI fell below the base-line level in seven SAS patients and in seven normal subjects. The decrease in VT/TI was accompanied by an increase in upper airway resistance. When the VT/TI decreased by 30% of its base-line level, pharyngeal resistance increased to 319.1 +/- 50.9% in SAS and 138.5 +/- 4.7% in normal subjects (P less than 0.05). We conclude that 1) in SAS patients, as in normal subjects, the activation of upper airway dilators is reflected by indexes that quantify the central inspiratory drive and 2) the pharyngeal patency is more sensitive to the decrease of the central respiratory drive in SAS patients than in normal subjects.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. Eikermann, F. M. Vogt, F. Herbstreit, M. Vahid-Dastgerdi, M. O. Zenge, C. Ochterbeck, A. de Greiff, and J. Peters
The Predisposition to Inspiratory Upper Airway Collapse during Partial Neuromuscular Blockade
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2007; 175(1): 9 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. M. Ryan and T. D. Bradley
Pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnea
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2440 - 2450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. Wellman, A. S. Jordan, A. Malhotra, R. B. Fogel, E. S. Katz, K. Schory, J. K. Edwards, and D. P. White
Ventilatory Control and Airway Anatomy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2004; 170(11): 1225 - 1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A.M. Lorino, F. Lofaso, E. Dahan, A. Harf, and H. Lorino
Respiratory impedance response to continuous negative airway pressure in awake controls and OSAS
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2001; 17(1): 71 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
F. SÉRIÈS, A. DEMOULE, I. MARC, C. SANFAÇON, J. P. DERENNE, and T. SIMILOWSKI
Inspiratory Flow Dynamics During Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Awake Normals During Nasal Breathing
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 1999; 160(2): 614 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
E. SFORZA, C. PETIAU, T. WEISS, A. THIBAULT, and J. KRIEGER
Pharyngeal Critical Pressure in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome . Clinical Implications
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 1999; 159(1): 149 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
F. Series and I. Marc
Effects of inspiratory and expiratory positive pressure difference on airflow dynamics during sleep
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 1998; 85(5): 1855 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. REDLINE, J. LEITNER, J. ARNOLD, P. V. TISHLER, and M. D. ALTOSE
Ventilatory-control Abnormalities in Familial Sleep Apnea
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 1997; 156(1): 155 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online