Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 67, Issue 3 933-937, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Reassessment of the interruption technique for measuring flow resistance in humans

G. Liistro, D. Stanescu, D. Rodenstein and C. Veriter
Pulmonary Laboratory, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium.

We have previously produced evidence that, in patients with obstructive lung disease, compliance of extrathoracic airways is responsible for lack of mouth-to-alveolar pressure equilibration during respiratory efforts against a closed airway. The flow interruption method for measuring respiratory resistance (Rint) is potentially faced with the same problems. We reassessed the merits of the interruption technique by rendering the extrathoracic airways more rigid and by using a rapid shutter. We measured airway resistance (Raw) with whole body plethysmography during panting (at 2 Hz) and Rint during quiet breathing. Rint and Raw were expressed as specific airway (sGaw) and interruptive conductance (sGint), respectively. In nine healthy subjects (cheeks supported), sGint (0.140 +/- 0.050 s-1.cmH2O-1) was lower (P less than 0.02) than sGaw (0.182 +/- 0.043 s-1.cmH2O-1). By contrast, in 12 patients with severe obstructive lung disease (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/vital capacity = 41.0 +/- 19.8%), sGint (0.058 +/- 0.012 s-1.cmH2O-1) was higher (P less than 0.05) than sGaw (0.047 +/- 0.007 s-1.cmH2O-1), when the cheeks were supported. When the mouth floor was also supported, average values of sGaw (0.048 +/- 0.008 s-1.cmH2O-1) and sGint (0.049 +/- 0.014 s-1.cmH2O-1) became similar. In conclusion, we confirm previous findings in healthy subjects of higher values of Rint, with respect to Raw, probably because of differences in glottis opening between quiet breathing and panting. In airflow obstruction, supporting both the cheeks and the mouth floor decreased sGint, which became similar to sGaw.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Beydon, S. D. Davis, E. Lombardi, J. L. Allen, H. G. M. Arets, P. Aurora, H. Bisgaard, G. M. Davis, F. M. Ducharme, H. Eigen, et al. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Pulmonary Function Testing in Preschool Children Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2007; 175(12): 1304 - 1345. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. K. Burki, W. J. Dale, and L.-Y. Lee Intravenous adenosine and dyspnea in humans J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2005; 98(1): 180 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N J Stevenson and P M A Calverley Effect of oxygen on recovery from maximal exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Thorax, August 1, 2004; 59(8): 668 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Fontana, T. Pantaleo, F. Lavorini, F. Bongianni, M. Mannelli, P. D. Bridge, and M. Pistolesi Handgrip-induced airway dilation in asthmatic patients with bronchoconstriction induced by MCh inhalation J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2002; 93(5): 1723 - 1730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Beydon, F. Amsallem, M. Bellet, M. Boule, M. Chaussain, A. Denjean, R. Matran, B. Wuyam, C. Alberti, and C. Gaultier Pre/Postbronchodilator Interrupter Resistance Values in Healthy Young Children Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2002; 165(10): 1388 - 1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Kessler, G. Mols, H. Bernhard, C. Haberthur, and J. Guttmann Interrupter airway and tissue resistance: errors caused by valve properties and respiratory system compliance J Appl Physiol, October 1, 1999; 87(4): 1546 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]