Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 67: 1081-1092, 1989;
8750-7587/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marini, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Truwit, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marini, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Truwit, J. D.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 67, Issue 3 1081-1092, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Determinants and limits of pressure-preset ventilation: a mathematical model of pressure control

J. J. Marini, P. S. Crooke 3rd and J. D. Truwit
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55101.

In recent years, four square-wave modes of pressure-preset mechanical ventilation (PPV)--pressure control, pressure support, inverse ratio, and airway pressure release ventilation--have been introduced to clinical practice. Conceptually, they share important features. Yet, because there remains widespread uncertainty regarding their ventilatory characteristics, efficacy, and appropriate use, the potential range of application is only now being investigated. To construct a unifying mathematical model of PPV, we developed a system of equations for prediction of the major "outcome" variables of PPV--tidal volume, minute ventilation, auto-positive end-expiratory pressure, mean alveolar pressure, and mechanical work--from the primary clinical "inputs" from patient (resistance, compliance) and clinician (applied pressure, frequency, inspiratory time fraction). Our analysis revealed distinct bounding limits for the outcome variables of ventilation and pressure and important implications for their clinical determinants. Although simplifying assumptions were required to enable construction of this mathematical analogue of respiratory system behavior, this model provides a firm conceptual framework for understanding the physiological interactions between PPV and the patients they are intended to help.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
P.-F. O Perrigault, Y. H Pouzeratte, S. Jaber, X. J Capdevila, M. Hayot, G. Boccara, M. Ramonatxo, and P. Colson
Changes in occlusion pressure (P0.1) and breathing pattern during pressure support ventilation
Thorax, February 1, 1999; 54(2): 119 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. NEUMANN, J. E. BERGLUND, E. F. MONDEJAR, A. MAGNUSSON, and G. HEDENSTIERNA
Effect of Different Pressure Levels on the Dynamics of Lung Collapse and Recruitment in Oleic-Acid-induced Lung Injury
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 1998; 158(5): 1636 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online