Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 67: 282-290, 1989;
8750-7587/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graham, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by George, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graham, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by George, J. C.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 67, Issue 1 282-290, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Thermal and metabolic responses to cold by men and by eumenorrheic and amenorrheic women

T. E. Graham, M. Viswanathan, J. P. Van Dijk, A. Bonen and J. C. George
School of Human Biology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Previous work has suggested that men (M) are more sensitive to cold stress than women. There have also been observations that suggest that amenorrheic women (AW) are less thermally responsive than eumenorrheic women (EW). We investigated the hypothesis that M, EW, and AW would have different responses to cold stress. The subjects (6/group) were tested four times: twice at rest for 60 min (5 and 22 degrees C) and twice in a progressive exercise test (5 and 22 degrees C). At rest at 22 degrees C AW had a lower O2 uptake (VO2) than M and lower rectal (Tre) and finger temperatures than EW. At rest at 5 degrees C both AW and EW had lower skin temperature (Tsk) than M, but there were no group differences in peripheral Tsk sites. M increased VO2 after 10 min and EW after 20 min of cold stress; however, AW did not increase metabolism until 60 min. In the two exercise tests Tre increased in proportion to relative work load; in the 5 degrees C test there was little evidence that exercise increased Tsk sites above rest levels. Few of the metabolic or thermal differences could be accounted for by body fatness, body surface area (BSA), or BSA/kg. The data support the hypothesis that M, EW, and AW have different responses to cold stress.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. Klentrou, M. Cunliffe, J. Slack, B. Wilk, O. Bar-Or, M. J. De Souza, and M. Plyley
Temperature regulation during rest and exercise in the cold in premenarcheal and menarcheal girls
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2004; 96(4): 1393 - 1398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. Tikuisis, I. Jacobs, D. Moroz, A. L. Vallerand, and L. Martineau
Comparison of thermoregulatory responses between men and women immersed in cold water
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2000; 89(4): 1403 - 1411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online