Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 66: 2522-2526, 1989;
8750-7587/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Carlo, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Carlo, W. A.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 66, Issue 6 2522-2526, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effects of unilateral nasal occlusion on ventilation and pulmonary resistance in infants

R. J. Martin, M. J. Miller, B. Siner, J. M. DiFiore and W. A. Carlo
Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Childrens Hospital, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106.

Because neonates are vulnerable to spontaneous nasal obstruction, this study was designed to evaluate the ventilatory consequences of obstructing a single nasal passage in preterm infants. We employed a nasal pneumotachograph that separately quantified airflow between the two nasal passages and permitted unilateral nasal mask occlusions. Changes in minute ventilation (VI) and total (RT) and inspiratory pulmonary resistance (RI) were measured in response to 30-s unilateral occlusions during quiet and active sleep in 11 subjects. Unilateral nasal obstruction caused VI to fall significantly in both sleep states, because of a fall in both tidal volume and respiratory rate, without alteration in transcutaneous blood gases. RT and RI increased by 27 and 24 cmH2O.1-1.s, respectively, during unilateral nasal occlusion; this increase was greater than would be expected solely from elimination of one nasal passage. In 7 of the 11 infants a single dominant side could be identified as contributing 56-67% to tidal volume. The effect of occlusion on VI, RT, or RI did not differ whether the dominant or nondominant side was occluded. We conclude that unilateral nasal mask occlusion increases RT and RI and decreases VI in preterm infants. The larger than expected increase in resistance suggests that unilateral nasal loading predisposes to narrowing of the extrathoracic airway, and this may explain the comparable ventilatory responses to occluding the dominant and nondominant nasal passage.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online