Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 66: 2496-2501, 1989;
8750-7587/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zin, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Saldiva, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zin, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Saldiva, P. H.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 66, Issue 6 2496-2501, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effects of abdominal opening on respiratory system mechanics in ventilated rats

W. A. Zin, M. A. Martins, P. R. Silva, R. S. Sakae, A. L. Carvalho and P. H. Saldiva
Instituto de Biofisica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

In 16 anesthetized paralyzed mechanically ventilated rats, respiratory system mechanics and rib cage dimensions were determined both before and after wide abdominal opening. In eight animals the end-inflation occlusion method disclosed statistically significant postoperative increases in respiratory system elastance (from 4.84 to 6.49 cmH2O.ml-1) and resistance (from 0.224 to 0.300 cmH2O.ml-1.s); the latter resulted from a rise of its uneven component (from 0.161 to 0.209 cmH2O.ml-1.s). In the remaining rats, rib cage morphometry at functional residual capacity after surgery showed significant decreases in lower rib cage circumference and anteroposterior and lateral diameters, whereas there was an increase in upper rib cage circumference and a fall in its lateral diameter. When these parameters were measured at end-inspiratory lung volume, the difference between intact and open abdomen were less striking; only lower rib cage circumference and upper rib cage lateral diameter significantly decreased postoperatively. Because surgery induced an expiratory volume of only 0.1 ml, it can be concluded that abdominal opening redistributed regional volumes within the lung, leading to increased unevenness in the system.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online