Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 66: 2251-2261, 1989;
8750-7587/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gavriely, N.
Right arrow Articles by Grotberg, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gavriely, N.
Right arrow Articles by Grotberg, J. B.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 66, Issue 5 2251-2261, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Flutter in flow-limited collapsible tubes: a mechanism for generation of wheezes

N. Gavriely, T. R. Shee, D. W. Cugell and J. B. Grotberg
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa.

We studied flutter in collapsible tubes as a possible mechanism for the generation of respiratory wheezes. The pressure-flow relationships and the wall oscillations of thick-walled [wall thickness (h)-to-lumen radius (r) ratio 1:1.7 to 1.3] self-supporting latex and Silastic tubes mounted between rigid pipes were measured. A high-impedance vacuum pump was connected to the downstream end. Upstream and downstream valves were used to control corresponding resistances. We found loud honking sounds and tube wall oscillations that occurred only when the tubes were buckled and flow limiting, i.e., when the flow became constant and independent of downstream driving pressure. The overall range of oscillatory frequencies was 260-750 Hz for airflow, presenting as sharp peaks of power on the frequency spectrum. The oscillatory frequencies (f) were higher at higher fluid velocities (u) and with narrower distance between opposing flattened walls (2b), resulting from increasing downstream suction pressure and the transmural pressure becoming more negative. The effect of u and b on f for a latex tube (h-to-r ratio 1:1.7) were found to be f = 228 + 0.021 (u/b). These relationships were valid throughout the range of oscillations in this tube (283-720 Hz) and with flow rates of 12-64 l/min. The experimental data were compared with predictions of the fluid dynamic flutter theory and the vortex-induced wall vibrations mechanism. We conclude that viscid flutter in soft tubes is the more probable mechanism for the generation of oscillations in the soft tube model and is a possible mechanism for the generation of respiratory wheezes.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. Huang and J. E. F. Williams
Neuromechanical interaction in human snoring and upper airway obstruction
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 1999; 86(6): 1759 - 1763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ThoraxHome page
M J Doherty, D P S Spence, D Graham, B M G Cheetham, X Q Sun, and J E Earis
A vibrating trachea
Thorax, March 1, 1998; 53(3): 230 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
H. PASTERKAMP, S. S. KRAMAN, and G. R. WODICKA
Respiratory Sounds . Advances Beyond the Stethoscope
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1997; 156(3): 974 - 987.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online