Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 66: 1242-1249, 1989;
8750-7587/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Series, F.
Right arrow Articles by La Forge, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Series, F.
Right arrow Articles by La Forge, J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 66, Issue 3 1242-1249, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Influence of respiratory drive on upper airway resistance in normal men

F. Series, Y. Cormier, M. Desmeules and J. La Forge
Centre de Pneumologie, Hopital Laval, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada.

The variations in nasal and pharyngeal resistance induced by changes in the central inspiratory drive were studied in 10 normal men. To calculate resistances we measured upper airway pressures with two low-bias flow catheters; one was placed at the tip of the epiglottis and the other in the posterior nasopharynx, and we measured flow with a Fleisch no. 3 pneumotachograph connected to a tightly fitting mask. Both resistances were obtained continuously during CO2 rebreathing (Read's method) and during the 2 min after a 1-min voluntary maximal hyperventilation. The inspiratory drive was estimated by measurements of inspiratory pressure generated at 0.1 s after the onset of inspiration (P0.1) and by the mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI). In each subject both resistances decreased during CO2 rebreathing; these decreases were correlated with the increase in P0.1. During the posthyperventilation period, ventilation fell below base line in seven subjects; this was accompanied by an increase in both nasal and pharyngeal resistances. These resistances increased exponentially as VT/TI decreased. Parallel changes in nasal and pharyngeal resistances were seen during CO2 stimulus and during the period after the hyperventilation. We conclude that 1) the indexes quantifying the inspiratory drive reflect the activation of nasopharyngeal dilator muscles (as assessed by the changes in upper airway resistance) and 2) both nasal and pharyngeal resistances are similarly influenced by changes in the respiratory drive.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
G. Pillar, A. Malhotra, R. B. Fogel, J. Beauregard, D. I. Slamowitz, S. A. Shea, and D. P. White
Upper airway muscle responsiveness to rising PCO2 during NREM sleep
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2000; 89(4): 1275 - 1282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. STRAUS, B. LOUIS, D. ISABEY, F. LEMAIRE, A. HARF, and L. BROCHARD
Contribution of the Endotracheal Tube and the Upper Airway to Breathing Workload
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 1997; 157(1): 23 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online