Journal of Applied Physiology Millar Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 66: 644-652, 1989;
8750-7587/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seale, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bodwell, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seale, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bodwell, C. E.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 66, Issue 2 644-652, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Sensitivity of methods for calculating energy expenditure by use of doubly labeled water

J. Seale, C. Miles and C. E. Bodwell
Energy and Protein Nutrition Laboratory, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Maryland 20705.

Attempts to estimate human energy expenditure by use of doubly labeled water have produced three methods currently used for calculating carbon dioxide production from isotope disappearance data: 1) the two-point method, 2) the regression method, and 3) the integration method. An ideal data set was used to determine the error produced in the calculated energy expenditure for each method when specific variables were perturbed. The analysis indicates that some of the calculation methods are more susceptible to perturbations in certain variables than others. Results from an experiment on one adult human subject are used to illustrate the potential for error in actual data. Samples of second void urine, 24-h urine, and breath collected every other day for 21 days are used to calculate the average daily energy expenditure by three calculation methods. The difference between calculated energy expenditure and metabolizable energy on a weight-maintenance diet is used to estimate the error associated with the doubly labeled water method.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. Mahabir, D. J Baer, C. Giffen, B. A Clevidence, W. S Campbell, P. R Taylor, and T. J Hartman
Comparison of energy expenditure estimates from 4 physical activity questionnaires with doubly labeled water estimates in postmenopausal women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2006; 84(1): 230 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. L Seale
Predicting total energy expenditure from self-reported dietary records and physical characteristics in adult and elderly men and women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2002; 76(3): 529 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. M Conway, J. L Seale, D. R Jacobs Jr, M. L Irwin, and B. E Ainsworth
Comparison of energy expenditure estimates from doubly labeled water, a physical activity questionnaire, and physical activity records
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2002; 75(3): 519 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
R. D. Reynolds, J. A. Lickteig, P. A. Deuster, M. P. Howard, J. M. Conway, A. Pietersma, J. deStoppelaar, and P. Deurenberg
Energy Metabolism Increases and Regional Body Fat Decreases While Regional Muscle Mass Is Spared in Humans Climbing Mt. Everest
J. Nutr., July 1, 1999; 129(7): 1307 - 1314.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online