|
|
||||||||
Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 66, Issue 1 61-71, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society
ARTICLES |
C. G. Hammond, D. C. Gordon, J. T. Fisher and F. J. Richmond
Department of Physiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Recent studies have demonstrated that, under certain circumstances, the diaphragm does not contract as a homogeneous unit. These observations suggest that motor units may not be randomly distributed throughout the muscle but confined to localized subvolumes. In the present study, electromyographic (EMG) and glycogen depletion methods were combined to investigate the organization of motor units supplied by the primary branches of the phrenic nerve in the cat. Four primary branches are generally present, one branch to the crus and three branches to the sternocostal region. The gross motor-unit territory of each of the four phrenic primary branches was determined by stimulating each nerve separately, while recording from nine EMG electrodes distributed over the hemidiaphragm. Stimulation of the crural branch evoked activity in the ipsilateral crus, whereas stimulation of each of the remaining branches evoked activity in discrete but overlapping areas of the sternocostal diaphragm. A more precise analysis of the distribution and borders of the motor territories was obtained by mapping regions depleted of muscle glycogen due to stimulation of each primary branch for 90 min. Glycogen depletion results closely matched the EMG findings of a localized distribution of motor units served by single primary branches. Stimulation of the crural branch typically caused depletion of the ipsilateral crus, whereas the sternocostal branches each served a striplike compartment. In the majority of cases, the borders of the sternocostal compartments were relatively abrupt and consisted of a 1- to 2-mm transition zone of depleted and nondepleted fibers. These studies demonstrate that motor unit territories of the primary branches of the phrenic nerve are highly delineated. This compartmentalization provides the central nervous system with the potential for a more precise regional motor control of costal and crural diaphragm than previously suspected.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. B. Mantilla and G. C. Sieck Key aspects of phrenic motoneuron and diaphragm muscle development during the perinatal period J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2008; 104(6): 1818 - 1827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kinugasa, Y. Kawakami, and T. Fukunaga Muscle activation and its distribution within human triceps surae muscles J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2005; 99(3): 1149 - 1156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Johnson Jr., C. C. W. Hsia, S.-I. Takeda, J. L. Wait, and R. W. Glenny Efficient design of the diaphragm: distribution of blood flow relative to mechanical advantage J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2002; 93(3): 925 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. KATAGIRI, M. KATAGIRI, T. M. KIESER, and P. A. EASTON Diaphragm Function during Sighs in Awake Dogs after Laparotomy Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 1998; 157(4): 1085 - 1092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |