Journal of Applied Physiology http://www.adinstruments.com/labchart/faseb
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 66: 492-497, 1989;
8750-7587/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orr, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Orr, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, A.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 66, Issue 1 492-497, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

A prototype gas exchange monitor for exercise stress testing aboard NASA Space Station

J. A. Orr, D. R. Westenskow and A. Bauer
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84132.

A monitor was developed to track weightlessness deconditioning aboard the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Space Station by measuring the O2 uptake (VO2) and CO2 production (VCO2) and calculating maximum VO2 and anaerobic threshold during an exercise stress test. The system uses two flowmeters in series to achieve a completely automatic flow calibration, and it uses breath-by-breath compensation for sample line transport delay. The accuracy of the system was measured over the range of VO2 and VCO2 from 100 to 800 ml/min by means of simulation. Accuracy was 0.54% for VO2 and 2.9% for VCO2. The system was further evaluated using two laboratory methods, the first method being comparison with a breath-by-breath system. As volunteers performed a maximum effort on a cycle ergometer, the mean difference in readings between the two systems was 17 ml/min for VO2 and 8.0 ml/min for VCO2. The correlation coefficient squared was greater than 0.96 for both. The second laboratory test was to use the system for 2 mo in a Human Performance Laboratory. Readings of maximum VO2 (VO2max) and anaerobic threshold were repeatable and consistent with the individual's activity level. The accuracy and convenience of operation will make this a valuable instrument aboard the Space Station.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online