Journal of Applied Physiology http://www.adinstruments.com/labchart/faseb
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 66: 360-369, 1989;
8750-7587/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnas, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mead, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnas, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mead, J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 66, Issue 1 360-369, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Impedance of the chest wall during sustained respiratory muscle contraction

G. M. Barnas, N. C. Heglund, D. Yager, K. Yoshino, S. H. Loring and J. Mead
Department of Environmental Science and Physiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

We measured total chest wall impedance (Zw), "pathway impedances" of the rib cage (Zrcpath), and diaphragm-abdomen (Zd-apath), and impedance of the belly wall including abdominal contents (Zbw+) in five subjects during sustained expiratory (change in average pleural pressure [Ppl] from relaxation = 10 and 20 cmH2O) and inspiratory (change in Ppl = -10 and -20 cmH2O) muscle contraction, using forced oscillatory techniques (0.5-4 Hz) we have previously reported for relaxation (J. Appl. Physiol. 66: 350-359, 1989). Chest wall configuration and mean lung volume were kept constant. Zw, Zrcpath, Zd-apath, and Zbw+ all increased greatly at each frequency during expiratory muscle contraction; increases were proportional to effort. Zw, Zrcpath, and Zd-apath increased greatly during inspiratory muscle contraction, but Zbw+ did not. Resistances and elastances calculated from each of the impedances showed the same changes during muscle contraction as the corresponding impedances. Each of the resistances decreased as frequency increased, independent of effort; elastances generally increased with frequency. These frequency dependencies were similar to those measured in relaxed or tetanized isolated muscle during sinusoidal stretching (P.M. Rack, J. Physiol. Lond. 183: 1-14, 1966). We conclude that during respiratory muscle contraction 1) chest wall impedance increases, 2) changes in regional chest wall impedances can be somewhat independent, depending on which muscles contract, and 3) increases in chest wall impedance are due, at least in part, to changes in the passive properties of the muscles themselves.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
I. Homma and K.-E. Hagbarth
Thixotropy of rib cage respiratory muscles in normal subjects
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2000; 89(5): 1753 - 1758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
W. Tomalak, R. Peslin, and C. Duvivier
Respiratory tissue properties derived from flow transfer function in healthy humans
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 1997; 82(4): 1098 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online