Journal of Applied Physiology Millar Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 65: 1962-1966, 1988;
8750-7587/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nattie, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ou, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nattie, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ou, L. C.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 65, Issue 5 1962-1966, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Pirenzepine prevents diethyl pyrocarbonate inhibition of central CO2 sensitivity

E. E. Nattie, J. W. Mills and L. C. Ou
Department of Physiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire 03756.

Application by pledget of the M1-antimuscarinic receptor agent pirenzepine (40 mM) to the rostral chemosensitive areas of the ventrolateral medulla in anesthetized, paralyzed, vagotomized, glomectomized, and servoventilated cats inhibited the slope of the integrated phrenic response to CO2 by 32.5% (P less than 0.03) and the maximum value by 21.1% (P less than 0.01). Similar application of the imidazole-histidine blocking agent diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC) decreased the slope by 40.3% (P less than 0.01) and the maximum value by 29.3% (P less than 0.05). Both responses confirm previous results. DEPC treatment decreased the effectiveness of subsequent pirenzepine application such that although slope and maximum were further decreased, the values were not significantly different from those after DEPC. Pirenzepine treatment prevented any subsequent DEPC inhibitory effect. The results raise the possibility that the inhibitory effects of DEPC on CO2 chemosensitivity are via muscarinic receptors and that muscarinic receptor involvement in CO2 chemosensitivity requires the presence of imidazole-histidine. Analysis by scintillation counting of successive 100-micron sections of medulla after rostral area application of [3H]pirenzepine indicated that the pirenzepine and DEPC effects are most probably within 2.0 mm of the ventral surface as measured from the midline, well away from the dorsal and ventral respiratory group neurons.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online