Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 65: 1938-1943, 1988;
8750-7587/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antol, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hyatt, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Antol, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hyatt, R. E.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 65, Issue 5 1938-1943, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Characteristics of tachyphylaxis to inhaled histamine in anesthetized dogs

P. J. Antol, M. Fujita and R. E. Hyatt
Division of Thoracic Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.

Three consecutive dose-response curves to aerosolized histamine were obtained in 11 anesthetized dogs. All dogs showed desensitization (i.e., tachyphylaxis) to high doses of histamine. Tachyphylaxis was highly reproducible. No tachyphylaxis occurred with inhaled acetylcholine or methacholine. Beta-Adrenergic blockade with propranolol or muscarinic blockade with atropine given intravenously had no effect on the histamine tachyphylaxis. Duration of thiamylal anesthesia did not alter the histamine responsiveness. Histamine tachyphylaxis was also seen with chloralose-urethan anesthesia. Since tachyphylaxis is not observed with acetylcholine, it cannot be attributed to a general decline in muscle contractility. We conclude that histamine tachyphylaxis in vivo is not explained by effects of cholinergic reflexes, catecholamine release, duration of anesthesia, or, probably, type of anesthetic agent.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. Shinozuka, J.-P. Lavoie, J. G. Martin, and J. H. T. Bates
Effect of time-varying load on degree of bronchoconstriction in the dog
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 1998; 85(4): 1464 - 1470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online