Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 65: 675-682, 1988;
8750-7587/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pardy, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pardy, R. L.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 65, Issue 2 675-682, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Diaphragmatic relaxation rate after voluntary contractions and uni- and bilateral phrenic stimulation

P. G. Wilcox, A. Eisen, B. J. Wiggs and R. L. Pardy
University of British Columbia, Pulmonary Research Laboratory, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.

We compared the rate of relaxation of the diaphragm (RRdi) after unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation, bilateral phrenic nerve stimulations, and short sharp voluntary contractions (sniffs). RRdi was measured as the maximum rate of decline in transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) corrected for the change in Pdi [maximum relaxation rate (MRR)/delta Pdi], the time constant (tau) of the later exponential decline in Pdi, and the time to half relaxation (1/2 RT). In five subjects there was no difference in mean RRdi apart from a smaller MRR/delta Pdi (P less than 0.05) for left unilateral compared with either right unilateral or bilateral needle stimulation. However, RRdi varied unpredictably between unilateral and bilateral stimulation of the phrenic nerve in individual subjects. In the same five subjects, sniffs were found to have a slower RRdi than bilateral stimulations (MRR/delta Pdi 0.0064 +/- 0.0007 vs. 0.0074 +/- 0.0018/ms, tau 57.2 +/- 8.7 vs. 48.2 +/- 7.4 ms, 1/2 RT 108.9 +/- 10.9 vs. 73.9 +/- 6.0 ms; all P less than 0.05). The application and inflation of an abdominal binder to an external pressure of 60 mmHg resulted in a decrease in functional residual capacity (-710 +/- 70 ml), but there was no effect on relaxation parameters. Our findings suggest that in the evaluation of RRdi 1) unilateral hemidiaphragmatic stimulations may not accurately reflect the in vivo contractile properties of the diaphragm, 2) sniff maneuvers are not voluntary equivalents of phrenic nerve stimulations, and 3) RRdi is not affected by abdominal binder inflation up to 60 mmHg.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
ATS/ERS Statement on Respiratory Muscle Testing
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2002; 166(4): 518 - 624.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. Coirault, D. Chemla, and Y. Lecarpentier
Relaxation of diaphragm muscle
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 1999; 87(4): 1243 - 1252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. I. Polkey, C.-H. Hamnegard, P. D. Hughes, G. F. Rafferty, M. Green, and J. Moxham
Influence of acute lung volume change on contractile properties of human diaphragm
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 1998; 85(4): 1322 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online