Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 64: 2659-2666, 1988;
8750-7587/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Axen, K.
Right arrow Articles by Haas, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Axen, K.
Right arrow Articles by Haas, F.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 64, Issue 6 2659-2666, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Respiratory load compensation in neuromuscular disorders

K. Axen, M. Bishop and F. Haas
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, New York University, New York 10016.

First-breath ventilatory responses to graded elastic (delta E) and resistive (delta R) loads from 10 people with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), 15 people with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), and 80 able-bodied people were compared. The SMA and DMD groups produced equal tidal volume, respiratory frequency, inspiratory duration (TI), expiratory duration, mean inspiratory airflow, and duty cycle responses to both delta E and delta R. Thus SMA (primarily a motoneuron disorder) and DMD (primarily a muscle disorder) have the same net effect on loaded breathing responses. The SMA and DMD groups failed to duplicate the normal group's short expirations during delta E, long inspirations during delta R, and thus, extended duty cycles during both delta E and delta R. The deficit in load compensation therefore was due to impaired regulation of respiratory timing (reflecting neural mechanisms) but not airflow defense (reflecting mechanical and neural mechanisms). One-fifth of the normal but none of the SMA or DMD subjects actively generated an "optimal" TI response (defined theoretically as TI greater than 160% control during large delta R and TI less than 75% control during large delta E). This lack of optimal responses, which is the same abnormality exhibited by quadriplegic people, suggests that SMA and DMD also impair human ability to discriminate between large delta R and delta E. These findings support the hypothesis that neuromuscular disorders can lead to disturbances in respiratory perception.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online