Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 64: 2558-2561, 1988;
8750-7587/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casale, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Weiler, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casale, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Weiler, J. M.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 64, Issue 6 2558-2561, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Airway reactivity to methacholine in nonatopic asymptomatic adults

T. B. Casale, B. J. Rhodes, A. L. Donnelly and J. M. Weiler
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242.

We studied 50 nonsmoking volunteers, ages 18-35 yr, with no past or present history or physical examination findings of asthma, rhinitis, allergic disease, or recent respiratory infections, to evaluate the usefulness of the methacholine bronchoprovocation challenge (MBPC) as a screening test for asthma. All were skin-test-negative to 29 aeroallergens and had base-line pulmonary function values greater than 80% predicted. Fourteen (28%) subjects had a drop in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 20% or greater at a provocative dose (PD20FEV1) less than or equal to 225 breath units. Moreover, when these subjects were compared with 21 asymptomatic allergic asthmatics, there was significant overlap between the two groups in concentration of methacholine causing this decline in FEV1. A positive MBPC at methacholine concentrations less than or equal to 5 mg/ml was not diagnostic of asthma, and a negative MBPC at methacholine concentrations greater than or equal to 10 mg/ml did not rule out asthma. These data strongly suggest that MBPC should not be used as the sole factor for the diagnosis of clinically significant asthma. A positive MBPC is one indication of the presence of airway hyperresponsiveness and thus is only one of many factors that must be considered in the diagnosis of asthma.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
B. J. Roth, L. M. Hammers, and T. A. Dillard
Methacholine Challenge Testing in Reserve Officer Training Corps Cadets
Chest, March 1, 2001; 119(3): 701 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
L. McGarvey, L. Heaney, J. MacMahon, M. Ennis, M. Fujimura, C. E. Brightling, and J. D. Pavord
EOSINOPHILIC BRONCHITIS IS AN IMPORTANT CAUSE OF CHRONIC COUGH
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2000; 161(5): 1764 - 1765.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online