Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 64: 2215-2219, 1988;
8750-7587/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubinstein, I.
Right arrow Articles by Zamel, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubinstein, I.
Right arrow Articles by Zamel, N.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 64, Issue 5 2215-2219, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Assessment of maximal expiratory pressure in healthy adults

I. Rubinstein, A. S. Slutsky, A. S. Rebuck, P. A. McClean, R. Boucher, A. Szeinberg and N. Zamel
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Maximal static expiratory pressure developed at the mouth (PEmax) provides a useful clinical index of expiratory muscle function; however, the range of normal values among laboratories shows considerable variation. We examined the hypothesis that the wide variability could be attributable to the differences in technique among laboratories. We measured PEmax at functional residual capacity (PEmax FRC) in 28 healthy subjects using the following five techniques: 1) using a scuba-type mouthpiece with the cheeks supported by the hands ("hands on"), 2) without supporting the cheeks ("no hands"), 3) using a rigid, circular mouthpiece (2.8 cm ID, "tube"), 4) using the scuba-type mouthpiece but with the cheeks supported by an observer ("other hands"), and 5) using a large-bore circular mouthpiece (4.1 cm ID, "new tube"). Mean PEmax FRC obtained with hands on was significantly higher than no-hands and tube methods. PEmax FRC values obtained by the other-hands and new-tube maneuvers were similar to the hands-on maneuver. We conclude that the technique used to measure PEmax FRC can significantly affect the results and suggest that it should be measured using a large-bore circular mouthpiece or a scuba-diving mouthpiece with the cheeks supported.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. Vitacca, M. Paneroni, L. Bianchi, E. Clini, A. Vianello, P. Ceriana, L. Barbano, B. Balbi, and S. Nava
Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressure measurement in tracheotomised patients
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2006; 27(2): 343 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. Coirault, A. Hagege, D. Chemla, M.-D. Fratacci, C. Guerot, and Y. Lecarpentier
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy Improves Respiratory Muscle Strength in Patients With Heart Failure
Chest, June 1, 2001; 119(6): 1755 - 1760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Nanas, J. Nanas, C. Kassiotis, G. Alexopoulos, A. Samakovli, J. Kanakakis, E. Tsolakis, and C. Roussos
Respiratory Muscles Performance Is Related to Oxygen Kinetics During Maximal Exercise and Early Recovery in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure
Circulation, August 3, 1999; 100(5): 503 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. SUZUKI, R. TANAKA, S. YAN, R. CHEN, P. T. MACKLEM, and B. KAYSER
Assessment of Abdominal Muscle Contractility, Strength, and Fatigue
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 1999; 159(4): 1052 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. I. POLKEY, R. A. LYALL, M. GREEN, P. NIGEL LEIGH, and J. MOXHAM
Expiratory Muscle Function in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1998; 158(3): 734 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online