Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 64: 1908-1915, 1988;
8750-7587/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rutledge, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Magder, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rutledge, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Magder, S.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 64, Issue 5 1908-1915, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Diaphragmatic energetics and blood flow during pulmonary edema and hypotension

F. S. Rutledge, S. N. Hussain, C. Roussos and S. Magder
Royal Victoria Hospital, Department of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

We studied the role of O2 supply and demand factors for producing diaphragmatic failure in a canine model of cardiogenic shock with pulmonary edema. We produced pulmonary edema with oleic acid and then hypotension with cardiac tamponade and followed the animals until respiratory failure began, which was defined by a 50% fall in frequency of breathing and diaphragmatic pressure-time index (PTI; cmH2O.s-1.min-1) with no decrease in the diaphragmatic electromyogram. Regional blood flows were measured with radiolabeled microspheres. Diaphragmatic O2 consumption (VO2 di) (ml.min-1.100 g-1) was determined from the diaphragmatic blood flow (Qdi) and the arterial and phrenic venous O2 contents. With oleic acid-induced pulmonary edema, PTI Qdi, and VO2 di increased from control of 101.7 +/- 31.7, 17 +/- 1.8, and 0.81 +/- 0.11, respectively, to 187.2 +/- 27.6, 42.2 +/- 7.2, and 3.32 +/- 0.35 (P less than 0.05). With tamponade, PTI did not change (186.7 +/- 60.0), whereas VO2 di increased further to 3.98 +/- 0.98 (P less than 0.05) due to increased O2 extraction and no significant change in Qdi (32.8 +/- 4.0). As fatigue developed, VO2 di decreased to 2.30 +/- 0.23 due to the combined effects of small declines in Qdi and the arterial O2 content but remained higher than control even though the energy demands returned to control values. In conclusion, when cardiogenic shock is added to pulmonary edema VO2 di and energy output do not increase further and eventually fall.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online