Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 64: 1554-1560, 1988;
8750-7587/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Smaldone, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Smaldone, G. C.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 64, Issue 4 1554-1560, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Use of aerosols to estimate mean air-space size in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

W. D. Bennett and G. C. Smaldone
Department of Medicine, State University of New York, StonyBrook 11794.

Using in vivo measures of aerosol recovery (RC) as a function of breath-hold time (t) (Gebhart et al. J. Appl. Physiol. 51: 465-476, 1981), we estimated the mean diameter (D) of the pulmonary air spaces in subjects diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n = 8) and in subjects with normal pulmonary function (n = 10). For each subject, RC (aerosol expired/aerosol inspired) decreased exponentially with t. Based on a model of the lung as a system of randomly oriented cylindrical tubes, the half time (t1/2) (i.e., the breath-hold time to reach 50% of RC with no breath hold) is proportional to a mean diameter (D) of air spaces filled with aerosol. Subjects with normal pulmonary function had a mean t1/2 = 6.5 +/- 0.8 s, corresponding to a mean D = 0.36 +/- 0.05 mm. On the other hand, subjects with COPD had a mean t1/2 = 12.7 +/- 3.2 s, corresponding to a mean D = 0.70 +/- 0.18 mm [i.e., twice as large (P less than 0.01) as normal subjects]. Furthermore, D correlated significantly with diffusing capacity in the patients with COPD (r = -0.95, P less than 0.001 for D vs. percent predicted diffusing capacity of CO) but not with any other measure of pulmonary function. In contrast, D varied only slightly in normals and did not correlate with any measure of pulmonary function. We conclude that in vivo measures of RC vs. t, in conjunction with other pulmonary function tests, may be a useful tool for identifying actual changes in pulmonary air-space sizes associated with pulmonary disease.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. KOHLHÄUFL, P. BRAND, C. ROCK, T. RADONS, G. SCHEUCH, T. MEYER, H. SCHULZ, K. J. PFEIFER, K. HÄUSSINGER, and J. HEYDER
Noninvasive Diagnosis of Emphysema . Aerosol Morphometry and Aerosol Bolus Dispersion in Comparison to HRCT
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1999; 160(3): 913 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 ChestHome page
P. Brand, M. Kohlhaufl, T. Meyer, T. Selzer, J. Heyder, and K. Hau{beta}inger
Aerosol-Derived Airway Morphometry and Aerosol Bolus Dispersion in Patients With Lung Fibrosis and Lung Emphysema
Chest, August 1, 1999; 116(2): 543 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online