Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 64: 511-520, 1988;
8750-7587/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanii, R.
Right arrow Articles by Younes, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanii, R.
Right arrow Articles by Younes, M.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 64, Issue 2 511-520, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Steady-state response of normal subjects to an inspiratory sinusoidal pressure load

R. Sanii and M. Younes
Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

Inspiratory duration (TI) increases during inspiratory resistive loading in conscious humans. To ascertain whether this response is related to the temporal pattern of pressure perturbation (reaching a peak in early or midinspiration and declining subsequently) we compared the response of nine normal subjects to a usual resistor (narrow tube, RES) with their response when mouth pressure was reduced in a sinusoidal fashion during inspiration (SIN). Whereas the negative pressure pattern was similar with both loads (peak negative pressure near midinspiration), there was no relation between pressure and flow in the case of sinusoidal loading. Each experiment consisted of two loading periods, 4 min each, and three unloaded periods, also 4 min each, bracketing the periods of loading. The order of RES and SIN was randomized. TI during loading was compared with the average TI of the preceding and following unloaded periods. TI increased 0.74 +/- 0.12 and 0.27 +/- 0.05 (SE) s during RES and SIN, respectively (P less than 0.01). We conclude that the temporal pattern of pressure change during resistance breathing plays a small role in mediating the TI prolongation. Coupling between flow and the pressure perturbation appears to be an important determinant of TI prolongation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online