Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 64: 31-41, 1988;
8750-7587/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luijendijk, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Milic-Emili, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luijendijk, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Milic-Emili, J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 64, Issue 1 31-41, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Breathing patterns in anesthetized cats and the concept of minimum respiratory effort

S. C. Luijendijk and J. Milic-Emili
Department of Medical Physiology, State University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Theoretical studies dealing with the principle of minimal respiratory effort usually make use of sinusoidal or saw-tooth-like breathing patterns. Recent observations in anesthetized cats have shown that the driving pressure waveform for inspiration can be described by a power function of time and that most of expiration is passive. This driving pressure waveform, however, results in breathing patterns that differ from those described above. For this reason, we have reevaluated in anesthetized cats the principle of minimal respiratory effort by computing optimal duration of inspiration (TI) and optimal tidal volume (VT) for different ventilatory conditions using actual driving pressure waveforms. The results are in qualitative agreement with the experimental observations; i.e., optimal TI decreases and optimal VT increases with increasing minute ventilation. On the average, a good agreement is found between measured and computed values of TI. In some cats, however, there are substantial differences between observed and predicted values of TI, which can probably be ascribed to inaccuracies in the data used in our computations. Despite its limitations, the present model analysis is more realistic than previous ones because actual driving pressure waveforms are used together with actual values of effective inspiratory impedance.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online