Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 63, Issue 6 2396-2402, Copyright © 1987 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Neuromuscular adaptations to training

R. J. Cannon and E. Cafarelli
Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether there is a central adaptation to resistance overload. The right adductor pollicis muscle of each subject was trained with either voluntary (n = 9) or electrically stimulated contractions (n = 7), the contralateral muscle acted as an internal control, and seven other subjects acted as a control group. Training was the same in both groups: 15 contractions at 80% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), 3 days/wk for 5 wk. Trained muscles in both groups increased MVC by approximately 15% (voluntary, P less than 0.01; stimulated, P less than 0.05). There was a small (9.5%) but significant (P less than 0.05) increase in MVC of the untrained muscles in the voluntary group. MVC did not change in the control group. Maximal electromyogram (EMG) was highly reproducible pre-to posttraining in the control group (r = 0.92, slope = 0.995) and did not change pre- to posttraining in the trained groups. Sensory adaptation to training caused a reduction in force sensation in the stimulated group (P less than 0.05) but not in the voluntary group. Because there was a small increase in MVC of the untrained muscle of the voluntary group (9.5%, P less than 0.05) but not in the stimulated group, it is possible that there is a central motor adaptation, but it is not manifested in increased neural drive (EMG). Moreover, this central adaptation may be responsible for the decrease in force sensation that follows training.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Del Balso and E. Cafarelli Adaptations in the activation of human skeletal muscle induced by short-term isometric resistance training J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2007; 103(1): 402 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Lagerquist, E. P. Zehr, and D. Docherty Increased spinal reflex excitability is not associated with neural plasticity underlying the cross-education effect J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2006; 100(1): 83 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R Pucci, L Griffin, and E Cafarelli Maximal motor unit firing rates during isometric resistance training in men Exp Physiol, January 1, 2006; 91(1): 171 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Munn, R. D. Herbert, and S. C. Gandevia Contralateral effects of unilateral resistance training: a meta-analysis J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2004; 96(5): 1861 - 1866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Hortobagyi, J. L. Taylor, N. T. Petersen, G. Russell, and S. C. Gandevia Changes in Segmental and Motor Cortical Output With Contralateral Muscle Contractions and Altered Sensory Inputs in Humans J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2451 - 2459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Brown, J. Taylor, and R. Gabriel Differential Effectiveness of Low-Intensity Exercise in Young and Old Rats J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., October 1, 2003; 58(10): B889 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Aagaard, E. B. Simonsen, J. L. Andersen, P. Magnusson, and P. Dyhre-Poulsen Neural adaptation to resistance training: changes in evoked V-wave and H-reflex responses J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2002; 92(6): 2309 - 2318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Aagaard, E. B. Simonsen, J. L. Andersen, S. P. Magnusson, J. Halkjar-Kristensen, and P. Dyhre-Poulsen Neural inhibition during maximal eccentric and concentric quadriceps contraction: effects of resistance training J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2000; 89(6): 2249 - 2257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Conley, M. H. Stone, M. Nimmons, and G. A. Dudley Resistance training and human cervical muscle recruitment plasticity J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1997; 83(6): 2105 - 2111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]