Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 63, Issue 5 2128-2133, Copyright © 1987 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Effect of anabolic steroids on overloaded and overloaded suspended skeletal muscle

R. W. Tsika, R. E. Herrick and K. M. Baldwin
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine 92717.

The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether anabolic steroids act synergistically with functional overload in terms of increasing muscle weight and subcellular protein content of normal overloaded and suspended overloaded rodent plantaris muscle. Female rats were randomly assigned to six groups (7 rats/group) for 6 wk: 1) normal control (NC), 2) overload (OV), 3) overload steroid (OV-S), 4) normal suspended (N-SUS), 5) overload suspended (OV-SUS), and 6) overload suspended steroid (OV-SUS-S). Rats receiving anabolic steroid were administered 0.3 mg nandrolone decanoate (Deca-Durabolin) per day. Relative to control values, overload induced 1) sparing of muscle weight of the OV-SUS group as well as larger absolute and normalized (mg muscle/g body wt) muscle weight of the OV group (P less than 0.05), 2) greater protein content (mg/muscle, P less than 0.05), and 3) an increased relative expression of slow myosin in both the OV and OV-SUS groups (P less than 0.05). Although anabolic steroid treatment of overload animals (OV-S) did not alter further the pattern of response of any parameter analyzed for the OV group, it did induce larger absolute and normalized muscle weight (P less than 0.05) as well as a greater protein content (mg/muscle, P less than 0.05) of the OV-SUS-S group compared with control values. However, anabolic steroid treatment did not alter the pattern of isomyosin expression observed in the overload (OV-S vs. OV) or overload suspended (OV-SUS-S vs. OV-SUS) groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Carson, W. J. Lee, J. McClung, and G. A. Hand Steroid receptor concentration in aged rat hindlimb muscle: effect of anabolic steroid administration J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2002; 93(1): 242 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Almurshed and K. K. Grunewald Dietary Protein Does Not Affect Overloaded Skeletal Muscle in Rats J. Nutr., July 1, 2000; 130(7): 1743 - 1748. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. C. Taylor, D. E. Brooks, and J. B. Ryan Anabolic-Androgenic Steroid Administration Causes Hypertrophy of Immobilized and Nonimmobilized Skeletal Muscle in a Sedentary Rabbit Model Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 1999; 27(6): 718 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Zachwieja, S. R. Smith, J. C. Lovejoy, J. C. Rood, M. M. Windhauser, and G. A. Bray Testosterone Administration Preserves Protein Balance But Not Muscle Strength during 28 Days of Bed Rest J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 1999; 84(1): 207 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. A. Karpakka, M. K. Pesola, and T. E.S. Takala The effects of anabolic steroids on collagen synthesis in rat skeletal muscle and tendon: A preliminary report Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1992; 20(3): 262 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF]