Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 63, Issue 5 1801-1805, Copyright © 1987 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Postural cardiovascular reflexes: comparison of responses of forearm and calf resistance vessels

L. K. Essandoh, D. A. Duprez and J. T. Shepherd
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.

Simultaneous measurements were made of changes in vascular resistance in the forearm and calf in response to moving from supine to sitting or to head-down tilt. The subjects were healthy male volunteers, 21-63 yr. Blood flows were measured by venous occlusion plethysmography using mercury-in-Silastic strain-gauges. The gauges were maintained at the same level relative to the heart during the postural changes. Arterial blood pressure was measured by auscultation; heart rate was counted from the plethysmograms. Changing from supine to sitting caused a decrease in forearm blood flow from 4.13 +/- 0.14 to 2.16 +/- 0.19 ml.100 ml-1.min-1. Corresponding calf flows were 4.21 +/- 0.32 and 4.40 +/- 0.59 ml.100 ml-1.min-1. There was no change in mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate increased by 8.0 +/- 1.5 beats/min. Arrest of the circulation of both legs with occlusion cuffs on the thighs before sitting, to prevent pooling of blood in them, reduced the degree of forearm vasoconstriction. Neck suction (40 Torr) during sitting, to oppose the decrease in transmural pressure at the carotid sinuses, inhibited the vasoconstriction. During a 30 degrees head-down tilt, there was a dilatation of forearm but not of calf resistance vessels. A Valsalva maneuver caused a similar constriction of both vascular beds. Thus, when changes in vascular resistance in forearm and calf are compared, the major reflex adjustments to changes in posture take place in the forearm.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E. J. Lott, C. Hogeman, M. Herr, M. Bhagat, A. Kunselman, and L. I. Sinoway Vasoconstrictor responses in the upper and lower limbs to increases in transmural pressure J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2009; 106(1): 302 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kitano, J. K. Shoemaker, M. Ichinose, H. Wada, and T. Nishiyasu Comparison of cardiovascular responses between lower body negative pressure and head-up tilt J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 2081 - 2086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Normand, O. Etard, and P. Denise Otolithic and tonic neck receptors control of limb blood flow in humans J Appl Physiol, June 1, 1997; 82(6): 1734 - 1738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Colardyn and D.L. Clement Differential Effects of Vasodilators on Forearm and Calf Vessels Angiology, April 1, 1990; 41(4): 313 - 317. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Pawelczyk and B. D. Levine Heterogeneous responses of human limbs to infused adrenergic agonists: a gravitational effect? J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2002; 92(5): 2105 - 2113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Legramante, A. Galante, M. Massaro, A. Attanasio, G. Raimondi, F. Pigozzi, and F. Iellamo Hemodynamic and autonomic correlates of postexercise hypotension in patients with mild hypertension Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2002; 282(4): R1037 - R1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]