Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 63: 1040-1048, 1987;
8750-7587/87 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yokozeki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yokozeki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, K.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 63, Issue 3 1040-1048, Copyright © 1987 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Thiol-dependent aminopeptidase (350,000 mol wt) as a marker of epidermal contamination in sweat

H. Yokozeki and K. Sato
Department of Dermatology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.

L-Leucine 2-naphthylamide (Leu-NA) hydrolytic activity is increased 20-fold in eccrine sweat collected by simple scraping (SS) compared with sweat collected over the white petrolatum (Vaseline) barrier (clean sweat, CS) [Am. J. Physiol. 250 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 19): R691-R698, 1986]. Sephadex G-200 chromatography of SS but not that of CS showed a single peak of Leu-NA hydrolytic activity (at pH 8) at 350,000 mol wt. An enzyme with similar molecular weight was eluted from tape-stripped stratum corneum and from stripped skin in situ. Anion-exchange FPLC of the 350,000 fractions yielded a single Leu-NA hydrolase peak at pH 8 (pool IV), which also showed hydrolytic activity for benzoyl-L-arginine-2-naphthylamide (BANA). Both Leu-NA and BANA hydrolytic activities of pool IV were thiol dependent, inhibited by heavy metals, and activated by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. The pool IV enzyme also hydrolyzed L-lysine- and L-arginine-2-naphthylamide. The most prominent BANA hydrolase activity was seen in both SS and CS at pH 5.0 at 33,000, which was not associated with Leu-NA hydrolytic activity. Diethylaminoethyl cellulose chromatography of the 33,000 fractions yielded three peaks of BANA hydrolytic activity in SS but only one in CS, suggesting that this thiol-dependent BANA hydrolyzing enzyme in CS may be of sweat gland origin. We conclude that the 350,000 thiol-dependent Leu-NA-hydrolyzing aminopeptidase is one of the most prominent epidermal contaminants and thus is a useful marker of epidermal contamination in sweat samples.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online